User:  Pass:        Forgot Password? Username?   |   Register
Banner

Kristine Ashcraft on Pharmacogenetics

OurBlook talks with Kristine Ashcraft, director of sales and marketing for Genelex Corp. in Seattle.

Editor's Note: Kristine is a molecular biologist by training.

Kristine Ashcraft, director of sales and marketing for Genelex Corp. in Seattle.

Your promotional video mentions that 100,000 people a year die from adverse reactions to prescribed medications, as not all people respond the same. Please tell us about the personalized medicine concept, or pharmacogenetics, and how it can deal with this problem.

KA: Research shows that of all the clinical factors such as age, sex, weight, general health and liver function that alter a patient's response to drugs, genetic factors are the most important. Approximately half of all Americans have genetic defects that affect how they process these drugs, and over 59 percent of the medications cited in adverse drug reaction studies are processed by enzymes with known genetic variants.

Currently, medications are prescribed in a one size fits all manner, so some patients get too high of a dose and some not enough. If the genetics are known in advance, physicians can use this information to personalize the dose and medication to the patient ... reducing the risk of adverse reactions.

A good example of this currently in the news is Plavix, a very commonly prescribed heart medication. Several recent studies have shown that approximately one third of patients with a genetic variation in a gene called CYP2C19 (pronounced sip 2c!19) are at double the risk of a serious cardiac event such as stroke when taking Plavix. With personalized medicine, a simple test could determine this ahead of time so dose adjustment or alternative medications could be used.

 

How widespread is this movement? Is it growing?

KA: It typically takes about 10 years to move technology from the lab into medical practice. Pharmacogenetic testing has now been available since 2000. Although more physicians are ordering the tests, it is not typically used. The main adopters at this juncture are oncologists and psychiatrists who are very concerned about finding the right medication as quickly as possible.

Consumers really need to be proactive about this. If someone has a history of bad reactions or treatment failures with medication, they should research the testing and ask their physician about it.

 

Are there any disadvantages to pharmacogenetics?

KA: As with any genetic test, there is the possibility that these genetic variations may later be found to increase risk of something other than ability to process medications. If people are concerned about this, it is always advisable to speak with a genetic counselor prior to testing.

 

Does the major health care reform bill that has been considered by Congress this year touch on the pharmacogenetics concept? If so, how, and if not, should provisions be added?

KA: Everyone in the personalized medicine community is excited about the appointment of Francis Collins to the head of the NIH. He is a proponent of personalized medicine and will certainly help usher in more widespread adoption.

In reference to major health care reform, one of the main blocks to the adoption of new technologies is that private insurers by necessity have a short-range view. Most patients switch health insurance companies before savings that take five years or more can be recouped. This makes genetic tests that are used for a lifetime unattractive from an insurer’s ROI perspective, even though the long-term savings are substantial. This needs to be addressed.

 

Is there anything else you'd like to say about personalized medicine or health reform or medical economics generally?

KA: Yes, one thing people need to understand about pharmacogenetics is that a small, fairly inexpensive panel of tests can be used to guide safer prescribing for an entire lifetime. Currently, the ROI is considered in silos ... does testing make sense for warfarin, does it make sense for tamoxifen, for Plavix? We need to move past this silo mentality. The question should be ... does this test make sense when it helps guide rational prescribing of more than half of the most commonly prescribed drugs for a person’s lifetime?

(Note: Kristine Ashcraft is a molecular biologist by training.)

 

$177,000,000,000.00

annual healthcare cost of ADRS 1

304,059,724

U.S. population 2

$582.12

ADR $ per person per year

77.9

Life expectancy in years 3

$45,347.34

Lifetime cost per person in ADRS

$26,754.93

59% of ADRs processed by drugs of pathways with PM variants 4

$13,377.47

50% of patients have genetic variations

30%

Percentage of ADR $ potentially attributable to genetic factors

$954.00

2D6 2C9 2C19 panel (current CPT code low reimbursement rate) Note: cost would come down substantially at this volume

$290,072,976,696.00

Lifetime cost to test all patients

$13,788,300,000,000.00

Lifetime cost of ADRs for all patients

2.10%

total number of ADRS that need to be avoided to break even

$399,342,023,304.00

savings if 5% are avoided

1.38

ROI at 5%

$1,088,757,023,304.00

Savings if 10% are avoided

3.75

ROI at 10%

$1,778,172,023,304.00

Savings if 15% are avoided

6.13

ROI at 15%

$2,467,587,023,304.00

Savings if 20% are avoided

8.51

ROI at 20%

1

J Am Pharm Assoc 41:192 2001

2

http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=uspopulation&met=population&tdim=true&q=us+population

3

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/PRESSROOM/07newsreleases/lifeexpectancy.htm

4

Phillips KA, Veenstra DL, Oren E, Lee JK, Sadee W: Potential role of pharmacogenomics in reducing adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. JAMA 286 (18): 2270–9, (2001)

 

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Healthcare Experts

Healthcare Experts
maya rockeymooreMaya Rockeymoore, former chief of staff for Rep. Charles Rangel, D-NY, and currently the president of Global Policy Solutions in Washington, D.C.

stephen kardosDr. Stephen Kardos, Routinely quoted by publications such as the WSJ for his knowledge of the healthcare system. He is board certified in pediatrics from the American Board of Pediatric

Ron WinceRon Wince, president and CEO of Guidon Performance solutions

 

Alford N. VassallDr. Alford N. Vassall, has practiced medicine in New Mexico for many years, and is contributing author of "Audacious Aging."

Eva Mor Dr. Eva Mor, author of  “Making the Golden Years Golden.” Mor has an M.A. in gerontology and health administration and a Ph.D. in epidemiology.

Matt ModleskiMatt Modleski, vice president of Stovall Grainger Modleski, Inc., healthcare consultants

Jim Lacy Jim Lacy, CFO and counsel of ZirMed Inc.

1.) Dr. Kathy McReynolds on Evidence-Based Medicine
OurBlook interview with Dr. Kathy McReynolds, a bio-ethicist with the Christian Institute on Disability...
read more »
2.) Ron Geraty on Healthcare Reform
  OurBlook interview with Dr. Ron Geraty, CEO of Alere. Auto insurance goes up or down depending on ...
read more »
3.) Susan Lawrence on Evidence Based Medicine
Interview with Susan Lawrence, M.D., founder and executive director of The Catalyst Foundation.   Describe ...
read more »
4.) Doug Moran on Shortage of Primary Care Physicians
OurBlook interview with Doug Moran, former deputy secretary for health and human resources for the State of ...
read more »
5.) Burkhardt: Give Patients Control Over Their Healthcare Costs
Jon Burkhardt, consultant with Frost & Sullivan's Healthcare group, discusses the healthcare reform bill ...
read more »
6.) Eva Mor on Healthcare Reform
OurBlook interview with Dr. Eva Mor, author of the new book “Making the Golden Years Golden.”President ...
read more »